Feb 26

In my previous post I touched on this. But I’d like to talk about it even further. I can’t say that this is an area in which I am very passionate. But it does seem pretty straightforward, and I’m very puzzled as to why it is even an issue here in the U.S. If you haven’t guessed already I’m against punishment.

There are actually very few countries that still allow this in the world today. So how is a country that claims to be on the cutting edge of technology and human rights still allowing this? Have we not evolved far enough to realize that killing doesn’t solve anything? Ninety seven percent of all executions in 2004 happened in four countries - Iran, China, Vietnam, and the U.S. The states that still allow this do not have less violent/death worthy crimes. In fact, in general they have more. Perhaps these states have always had a bigger problem with crime, thus ‘needing’ the death penalty. But it is unlikely. Consider, for example, the fact that crime dropped by 20% in Canada after it dropped the death penalty.

Another popular argument is the cost to the taxpayers. In actuality, it costs on average as much to execute someone as it does to hold them in prison for 40 years.

Human life is sacred. There is only so much ‘justice’ that can be done here on earth. Leave the rest to God.

Family and friends who hope to find closure in this final punishment for the ‘evildoer’ I would have to imagine only end up living much of their life dwelling and obsessing over vengeance.

And finally, most importantly, rather than deterring violence in our country and world, it mearly feeds the complicated social problem, worsening the climate of violence in the worl.